Telalim
How Telalim voted in 2021
235 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 25.96% 61 votes |
+12.0 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 19.57% 46 votes |
+13.5 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 15.74% 37 votes |
−8.4 |
| כן כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 10.64% 25 votes |
+4.0 |
| ב ימינה בראשות נפתלי בנט | 9.36% 22 votes |
+3.2 |
| ת תקווה חדשה בהנהגת גדעון סער לראשות הממשלה | 6.38% 15 votes |
+1.6 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 5.11% 12 votes |
−0.5 |
| מרצ מרצ – השמאל של ישראל | 4.68% 11 votes |
+0.1 |
| ט הציונות הדתית בראשות בצלאל סמוטריץ' | 1.70% 4 votes |
−3.4 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קי | מפלגת שמע בראשות נפתלי גולדמן | 0.43% | 1 | +0.4 |
| רף | מפלגת עם שלם – בראשות הרב חיים אמסלם | 0.43% | 1 | +0.4 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
235 voters out of 355 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has a stable position in only one election.
Telalim against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Misgav Dov · Ruhama · En Dor
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Misgav Dov | 395 |
| Ruhama | 368 |
| En Dor | 578 |
| Gan Shelomo | 331 |
| Hadar Am | 409 |
| Kefar Masaryk | 426 |
| Erez | 323 |
| Kefar Gil'adi | 356 |
9 elections in Telalim
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 455 | 312 | 68.6% | −2.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 355 | 235 | 66.2% | −1.2 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 330 | 234 | 70.9% | −0.6 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 322 | 219 | 68.0% | −1.9 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 311 | 225 | 72.3% | +3.9 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 181 | 143 | 79.0% | +6.7 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 109 | 82 | 75.2% | +7.5 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 142 | 93 | 65.5% | +3.0 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 66 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.