Sufa
How Sufa voted in 2019
119 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד | 49.58% 59 votes |
+23.5 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות אבי גבאי | 15.97% 19 votes |
+11.5 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 8.40% 10 votes |
−18.1 |
| כ כולנו הימין השפוי בראשות משה כחלון | 5.88% 7 votes |
+2.3 |
| מרצ מרצ- השמאל של ישראל | 5.88% 7 votes |
+2.3 |
| ום חד"ש תע"ל בראשות איימן עודה ואחמד טיבי | 0.84% 1 votes |
−3.6 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו | 0.84% 1 votes |
−3.2 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 5 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ז | זהות - תנועה ישראלית יהודית בהנהגת משה פייגלין | 4.20% | 5 | +1.5 |
| נר | גשר בראשות אורלי לוי אבקסיס | 4.20% | 5 | +2.5 |
| נ | הימין החדש בראשות שקד ובנט | 2.52% | 3 | −0.7 |
| יץ | אחריות למייסדים בראשות חיים דיין | 0.84% | 1 | +0.8 |
| נץ | מגן בראשות גל הירש | 0.84% | 1 | +0.8 |
What happened to these votes
5 people in Sufa voted for זהות - תנועה ישראלית יהודית בהנהגת משה פייגלין. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 4.20% here, 1.5 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 2.74%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
119 voters out of 185 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Sufa against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
10 elections in Sufa
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 189 | 107 | 56.6% | −14.0 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 187 | 115 | 61.5% | −5.9 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 186 | 110 | 59.1% | −12.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 183 | 111 | 60.7% | −9.2 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 185 | 119 | 64.3% | −4.1 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 192 | 144 | 75.0% | +2.7 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 178 | 120 | 67.4% | −0.4 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 163 | 119 | 73.0% | +10.5 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 127 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 289 | 157 | 54.3% | −11.3 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.