Sufa
How Sufa voted in 2019
111 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן - בראשות בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד | 61.26% 68 votes |
+35.3 |
| מרצ המחנה הדמוקרטי בהנהגת הורוביץ, שפיר וברק | 10.81% 12 votes |
+6.5 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר בראשות עמיר פרץ ואורלי לוי אבקסיס | 9.01% 10 votes |
+4.2 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 8.11% 9 votes |
+1.1 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 6.31% 7 votes |
−18.8 |
| טב ימינה בראשות איילת שקד הבית היהודי-האיחוד הלאומי-הימין החדש | 2.70% 3 votes |
−3.2 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| זץ | צומת - התיישבות וחקלאות | 0.90% | 1 | +0.6 |
| ףז | הפיראטים - כי כולנו באותה סירה והכל אותו שייט | 0.90% | 1 | +0.9 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
111 voters out of 183 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Sufa against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Yiftah · Gazit · Ramat HaShofet
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Yiftah | 370 |
| Gazit | 455 |
| Ramat HaShofet | 509 |
| Nahsholim | 416 |
| Talme Yafe | 359 |
| Bet HaEmeq | 351 |
| Sharona | 346 |
| Eyal | 305 |
10 elections in Sufa
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 189 | 107 | 56.6% | −14.0 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 187 | 115 | 61.5% | −5.9 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 186 | 110 | 59.1% | −12.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 183 | 111 | 60.7% | −9.2 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 185 | 119 | 64.3% | −4.1 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 192 | 144 | 75.0% | +2.7 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 178 | 120 | 67.4% | −0.4 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 163 | 119 | 73.0% | +10.5 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 127 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 289 | 157 | 54.3% | −11.3 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.