Deqel
How Deqel voted in 2015
164 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת המחנה הציוני בראשות יצחק הרצוג וציפי לבני | 30.49% 50 votes |
+11.8 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 21.34% 35 votes |
−2.1 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 17.68% 29 votes |
+8.9 |
| כ כולנו בראשות משה כחלון | 10.37% 17 votes |
+2.9 |
| טב הבית היהודי בראשות נפתלי בנט | 9.15% 15 votes |
+2.4 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 5.49% 9 votes |
+0.4 |
| מרצ השמאל של ישראל | 2.44% 4 votes |
−1.5 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קנ | עלה ירוק - גאה בבחירה שלי | 3.05% | 5 | +1.9 |
What happened to these votes
5 people in Deqel voted for עלה ירוק - גאה בבחירה שלי. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 3.05% here, 2.7 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.12%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
164 voters out of 241 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Deqel against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Talme El'azar · Bet She'arim · Shilat
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Talme El'azar | 433 |
| Bet She'arim | 408 |
| Shilat | 351 |
| Kefar HaHoresh | 331 |
| Deganya Bet | 404 |
| Allonim | 403 |
| Reshafim | 310 |
| Erez | 302 |
10 elections in Deqel
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 280 | 177 | 63.2% | −7.4 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 277 | 187 | 67.5% | +0.1 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 270 | 183 | 67.8% | −3.7 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 265 | 170 | 64.2% | −5.7 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 258 | 188 | 72.9% | +4.4 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 241 | 164 | 68.0% | −4.3 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 260 | 168 | 64.6% | −3.2 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 248 | 155 | 62.5% | −0.0 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 120 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 220 | 112 | 50.9% | −14.7 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.