Deqel
How Deqel voted in 2020
182 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 46.15% 84 votes |
+19.6 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 31.32% 57 votes |
+1.9 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר - מרצ | 12.09% 22 votes |
+6.3 |
| טב ימינה הימין החדש – הבית היהודי – האיחוד הלאומי | 5.49% 10 votes |
+0.3 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 3.85% 7 votes |
−1.9 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נץ | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 1.10% | 2 | +0.7 |
What happened to these votes
2 people in Deqel voted for עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 1.10% here, 2.6 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.42%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
183 voters out of 270 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Deqel against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Ruhama · Deganya Bet · Ashdot Ya'aqov(Me'uhad)
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Ruhama | 352 |
| Deganya Bet | 403 |
| Ashdot Ya'aqov(Me'uhad) | 362 |
| She'ar Yashuv | 302 |
| Mishmar Ayyalon | 308 |
| Herev Le'Et | 413 |
| Orot | 317 |
| Avigedor | 484 |
10 elections in Deqel
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 280 | 177 | 63.2% | −7.4 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 277 | 187 | 67.5% | +0.1 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 270 | 183 | 67.8% | −3.7 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 265 | 170 | 64.2% | −5.7 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 258 | 188 | 72.9% | +4.4 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 241 | 164 | 68.0% | −4.3 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 260 | 168 | 64.6% | −3.2 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 248 | 155 | 62.5% | −0.0 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 120 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 220 | 112 | 50.9% | −14.7 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.