Newe Shalom
How Newe Shalom voted in 2015
136 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת (חד"ש, רע"מ, בל"ד, תע"ל) | 58.82% 80 votes |
+48.2 |
| מרצ השמאל של ישראל | 27.21% 37 votes |
+23.3 |
| אמת המחנה הציוני בראשות יצחק הרצוג וציפי לבני | 9.56% 13 votes |
−9.1 |
| כ כולנו בראשות משה כחלון | 2.21% 3 votes |
−5.3 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ע | הרשימה הערבית | 1.47% | 2 | +1.4 |
| קנ | עלה ירוק - גאה בבחירה שלי | 0.74% | 1 | −0.4 |
What happened to these votes
2 people in Newe Shalom voted for הרשימה הערבית. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 1.47% here, 14.4 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.10%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
136 voters out of 171 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Newe Shalom against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Rumat Heib · Sayyid · Qasr A-Sir
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Rumat Heib | 452 |
| Sayyid | 655 |
| Qasr A-Sir | 353 |
| Aramsha | 434 |
| Rummane | 493 |
| Kudayrat as-Sani' | 382 |
| Umm Al-Qutuf | 519 |
| Tayibe(Baemeq) | 619 |
10 elections in Newe Shalom
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 253 | 186 | 73.5% | +2.9 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 230 | 178 | 77.4% | +9.9 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 225 | 171 | 76.0% | +4.5 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 213 | 168 | 78.9% | +9.0 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 205 | 145 | 70.7% | +2.3 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 171 | 136 | 79.5% | +7.2 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 162 | 127 | 78.4% | +10.6 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 139 | 110 | 79.1% | +16.6 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 89 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 78 | 65 | 83.3% | +17.7 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.