Newe Shalom
How Newe Shalom voted in 2022
185 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| ום חד"ש תע"ל בראשות איימן עודה ואחמד טיבי | 20.00% 37 votes |
+16.2 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 8.11% 15 votes |
+4.4 |
| פה Yesh Atid | 5.41% 10 votes |
−12.4 |
| עם Ra'am | 4.32% 8 votes |
+0.3 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ד | בל"ד - אלתג`מוע אלווטני אלדמוקרטי בראשות סמי אבו ש | 31.35% | 58 | +28.4 |
| מרצ | מרצ השמאל של ישראל בראשות זהבה גלאון | 30.81% | 57 | +27.6 |
What happened to these votes
58 people in Newe Shalom voted for בל"ד - אלתג`מוע אלווטני אלדמוקרטי בראשות סמי אבו ש. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 31.35% here, 10.8 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 2.91%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
186 voters out of 253 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Newe Shalom against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Umm Al-Qutuf · Na'ura · Manshiyyet Zabda
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Umm Al-Qutuf | 446 |
| Na'ura | 850 |
| Manshiyyet Zabda | 489 |
| Aramsha | 503 |
| Hamam | 592 |
| Arab Al Naim | 333 |
| Tamra (Yizre'el) | 498 |
| Atrash | 598 |
10 elections in Newe Shalom
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 253 | 186 | 73.5% | +2.9 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 230 | 178 | 77.4% | +9.9 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 225 | 171 | 76.0% | +4.5 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 213 | 168 | 78.9% | +9.0 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 205 | 145 | 70.7% | +2.3 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 171 | 136 | 79.5% | +7.2 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 162 | 127 | 78.4% | +10.6 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 139 | 110 | 79.1% | +16.6 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 89 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 78 | 65 | 83.3% | +17.7 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.