Haluz
How Haluz voted in 2003
144 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת העבודה - מימד בראשות מצנע | 28.47% 41 votes |
+14.0 |
| מרצ מרצ - הבחירה הדמוקרטית - שחר | 22.92% 33 votes |
+17.7 |
| יש שינוי מפלגת החילונים ומעמד הביניים | 22.22% 32 votes |
+9.9 |
| מחל הליכוד עם אריאל שרון לראשות הממשלה | 15.28% 22 votes |
−14.1 |
| ל האיחוד הלאומי ישראל ביתנו - מולדת תקומה | 4.17% 6 votes |
−1.4 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (1.5%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קנ | עלה ירוק | 3.47% | 5 | +2.3 |
| רק | הירוקים | 3.47% | 5 | +3.1 |
What happened to these votes
5 people in Haluz voted for עלה ירוק. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 3.47% here, 2.9 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.20%, below the 1.5% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
146 voters out of 217 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Haluz against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Kefar Blum · Ma'oz Hayyim · Bet HaShitta
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Kefar Blum | 349 |
| Ma'oz Hayyim | 323 |
| Bet HaShitta | 611 |
| Midreshet Ben Gurion | 318 |
| Rishpon | 457 |
| Ma'anit | 329 |
| Kefar Szold | 309 |
| Ramat HaShofet | 320 |
10 elections in Haluz
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 454 | 296 | 65.2% | −5.4 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 426 | 294 | 69.0% | +1.6 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 415 | 271 | 65.3% | −6.2 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 412 | 272 | 66.0% | −3.8 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 399 | 282 | 70.7% | +2.2 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 335 | 232 | 69.3% | −3.1 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 287 | 197 | 68.6% | +0.9 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 228 | 156 | 68.4% | +5.9 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 148 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 217 | 146 | 67.3% | +1.7 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.