Haluz
How Haluz voted in 2019
272 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן - בראשות בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד | 52.21% 142 votes |
+26.3 |
| מרצ המחנה הדמוקרטי בהנהגת הורוביץ, שפיר וברק | 26.10% 71 votes |
+21.8 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר בראשות עמיר פרץ ואורלי לוי אבקסיס | 10.66% 29 votes |
+5.9 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 5.88% 16 votes |
−19.2 |
| טב ימינה בראשות איילת שקד הבית היהודי-האיחוד הלאומי-הימין החדש | 1.84% 5 votes |
−4.0 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 1.47% 4 votes |
−5.5 |
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת חד"ש, רע"ם, תע"ל, בל"ד | 1.10% 3 votes |
−9.5 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי התורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 0.37% 1 votes |
−7.1 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| זץ | צומת - התיישבות וחקלאות | 0.37% | 1 | +0.0 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
272 voters out of 412 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Haluz against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Afeq · Bet Qeshet · Qoranit
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Afeq | 365 |
| Bet Qeshet | 353 |
| Qoranit | 474 |
| Amir | 357 |
| Barqay | 334 |
| Huqoq | 307 |
| Sede Yo'av | 301 |
| Ga'ton | 393 |
10 elections in Haluz
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 454 | 296 | 65.2% | −5.4 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 426 | 294 | 69.0% | +1.6 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 415 | 271 | 65.3% | −6.2 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 412 | 272 | 66.0% | −3.8 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 399 | 282 | 70.7% | +2.2 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 335 | 232 | 69.3% | −3.1 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 287 | 197 | 68.6% | +0.9 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 228 | 156 | 68.4% | +5.9 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 148 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 217 | 146 | 67.3% | +1.7 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.