Tel Te'omim
How Tel Te'omim voted in 2021
240 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 53.75% 129 votes |
+29.6 |
| ב ימינה בראשות נפתלי בנט | 18.33% 44 votes |
+12.1 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 8.33% 20 votes |
+1.2 |
| ט הציונות הדתית בראשות בצלאל סמוטריץ' | 7.50% 18 votes |
+2.4 |
| ת תקווה חדשה בהנהגת גדעון סער לראשות הממשלה | 4.17% 10 votes |
−0.6 |
| כן כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 2.92% 7 votes |
−3.7 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 1.67% 4 votes |
−12.3 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל – דגל התורה | 0.42% 1 votes |
−5.2 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 3 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| יז | הכלכלית החדשה בראשות פרופסור ירון זליכה | 2.08% | 5 | +1.3 |
| ר | רפא – רק בריאות בראשות דוקטור אריה אבני | 0.42% | 1 | +0.0 |
| רנ | התקווה לשינוי | 0.42% | 1 | +0.4 |
What happened to these votes
5 people in Tel Te'omim voted for הכלכלית החדשה בראשות פרופסור ירון זליכה. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 2.08% here, 2.6 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.79%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
240 voters out of 343 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Tel Te'omim against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
10 elections in Tel Te'omim
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 345 | 269 | 78.0% | +7.3 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 343 | 240 | 70.0% | +2.5 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 337 | 253 | 75.1% | +3.6 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 328 | 233 | 71.0% | +1.2 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 326 | 245 | 75.2% | +6.7 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 295 | 212 | 71.9% | −0.5 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 269 | 178 | 66.2% | −1.6 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 222 | 133 | 59.9% | −2.6 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 105 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 175 | 120 | 68.6% | +3.0 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.