Tel Te'omim
How Tel Te'omim voted in 2022
269 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל Likud | 50.19% 135 votes |
+26.8 |
| ט Religious Zionist Party | 21.93% 59 votes |
+11.1 |
| כן National Unity | 10.78% 29 votes |
+1.7 |
| שס Shas | 9.67% 26 votes |
+1.4 |
| פה Yesh Atid | 1.49% 4 votes |
−16.3 |
| ג United Torah Judaism | 0.74% 2 votes |
−5.1 |
| ל Yisrael Beiteinu | 0.37% 1 votes |
−4.1 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ב | הבית היהודי בראשות איילת שקד | 4.09% | 11 | +2.9 |
| יז | הכלכלית החדשה בראשות פרופסור ירון זליכה | 0.74% | 2 | +0.5 |
What happened to these votes
11 people in Tel Te'omim voted for הבית היהודי בראשות איילת שקד. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 4.09% here, 3.4 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.19%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
269 voters out of 345 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Tel Te'omim against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Hafez Hayyim · Ben Zakkay · Yaqir
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Hafez Hayyim | 307 |
| Ben Zakkay | 490 |
| Yaqir | 1,098 |
| Enav | 459 |
| Kokhav HaShahar | 1,071 |
| Bat Ayin | 594 |
| Bar Yohay | 473 |
| Haspin | 644 |
10 elections in Tel Te'omim
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 345 | 269 | 78.0% | +7.3 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 343 | 240 | 70.0% | +2.5 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 337 | 253 | 75.1% | +3.6 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 328 | 233 | 71.0% | +1.2 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 326 | 245 | 75.2% | +6.7 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 295 | 212 | 71.9% | −0.5 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 269 | 178 | 66.2% | −1.6 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 222 | 133 | 59.9% | −2.6 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 105 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 175 | 120 | 68.6% | +3.0 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.