Or HaGanuz
How Or HaGanuz voted in 2019
155 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 47.74% 74 votes |
+42.0 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי התורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 23.23% 36 votes |
+17.2 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 11.61% 18 votes |
−14.9 |
| טב איחוד מפלגות הימין הבית היהודי-האיחוד הלאומי- עוצמה יהודית | 7.74% 12 votes |
+4.0 |
| מרצ מרצ- השמאל של ישראל | 1.29% 2 votes |
−2.3 |
| כ כולנו הימין השפוי בראשות משה כחלון | 0.65% 1 votes |
−2.9 |
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד | 0.65% 1 votes |
−25.5 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 3 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ז | זהות - תנועה ישראלית יהודית בהנהגת משה פייגלין | 4.52% | 7 | +1.8 |
| נ | הימין החדש בראשות שקד ובנט | 1.94% | 3 | −1.3 |
| נר | גשר בראשות אורלי לוי אבקסיס | 0.65% | 1 | −1.1 |
What happened to these votes
7 people in Or HaGanuz voted for זהות - תנועה ישראלית יהודית בהנהגת משה פייגלין. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 4.52% here, 1.6 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 2.74%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
157 voters out of 257 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Or HaGanuz against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
10 elections in Or HaGanuz
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 323 | 215 | 66.6% | −4.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 296 | 162 | 54.7% | −12.7 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 281 | 184 | 65.5% | −6.0 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 272 | 183 | 67.3% | −2.6 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 257 | 157 | 61.1% | −7.4 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 164 | 125 | 76.2% | +3.9 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 161 | 104 | 64.6% | −3.2 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 153 | 100 | 65.4% | +2.9 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 68 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 110 | 73 | 66.4% | +0.8 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.