Or HaGanuz
How Or HaGanuz voted in 2021
161 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל – דגל התורה | 44.72% 72 votes |
+39.1 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 31.06% 50 votes |
+23.9 |
| ט הציונות הדתית בראשות בצלאל סמוטריץ' | 18.01% 29 votes |
+12.9 |
| ב ימינה בראשות נפתלי בנט | 3.11% 5 votes |
−3.1 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 1.24% 2 votes |
−23.0 |
| מרצ מרצ – השמאל של ישראל | 0.62% 1 votes |
−4.0 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 0.62% 1 votes |
−13.3 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ר | רפא – רק בריאות בראשות דוקטור אריה אבני | 0.62% | 1 | +0.2 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
162 voters out of 296 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Or HaGanuz against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Bne Dkalim · Bet Hilqiyya · Brukhin
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Bne Dkalim | 536 |
| Bet Hilqiyya | 390 |
| Brukhin | 474 |
| Yizhar | 564 |
| Yesodot | 312 |
| Itamar | 434 |
| Qiryat Netafim | 359 |
| Ma'ale Levona | 334 |
10 elections in Or HaGanuz
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 323 | 215 | 66.6% | −4.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 296 | 162 | 54.7% | −12.7 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 281 | 184 | 65.5% | −6.0 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 272 | 183 | 67.3% | −2.6 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 257 | 157 | 61.1% | −7.4 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 164 | 125 | 76.2% | +3.9 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 161 | 104 | 64.6% | −3.2 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 153 | 100 | 65.4% | +2.9 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 68 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 110 | 73 | 66.4% | +0.8 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.