Ne'urim
How Ne'urim voted in 2009
57 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| כן קדימה – עם ציפי לבני לראשות הממשלה | 50.88% 29 votes |
+28.4 |
| אמת העבודה בראשות אהוד ברק | 17.54% 10 votes |
+7.6 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 10.53% 6 votes |
−1.2 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 8.77% 5 votes |
+0.3 |
| מחל הליכוד – אח"י בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 7.02% 4 votes |
−14.6 |
| מרצ התנועה החדשה מרצ | 3.51% 2 votes |
+0.6 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ה | התנועה היירוקה מימד בראשות הרב מלכיאור וערן בן-ימיני | 1.75% | 1 | +0.9 |
What happened to these votes
1 people in Ne'urim voted for התנועה היירוקה מימד בראשות הרב מלכיאור וערן בן-ימיני. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 1.75% here, 2.1 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.82%, below the 2.0% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
58 voters out of 127 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Ne'urim against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Afiqim · Gesher HaZiw · Daliyya
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 15 times the number of valid votes).
| Afiqim | 678 |
| Gesher HaZiw | 632 |
| Daliyya | 478 |
| Kefar Netter | 480 |
| Bazra | 491 |
| Atsmon Segev | 488 |
| Kefar Azza | 450 |
| Hilla | 313 |
10 elections in Ne'urim
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 158 | 62 | 39.2% | −31.4 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 169 | 69 | 40.8% | −26.6 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 174 | 73 | 42.0% | −29.6 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 195 | 73 | 37.4% | −32.4 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 173 | 75 | 43.4% | −25.1 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 157 | 79 | 50.3% | −22.0 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 159 | 75 | 47.2% | −20.6 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 127 | 58 | 45.7% | −16.8 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 52 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 122 | 55 | 45.1% | −20.5 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.