Ne'urim
How Ne'urim voted in 2022
61 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה Yesh Atid | 31.15% 19 votes |
+13.4 |
| כן National Unity | 29.51% 18 votes |
+20.4 |
| ל Yisrael Beiteinu | 13.11% 8 votes |
+8.6 |
| מחל Likud | 11.48% 7 votes |
−11.9 |
| ט Religious Zionist Party | 6.56% 4 votes |
−4.3 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 4.92% 3 votes |
+1.2 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| מרצ | מרצ השמאל של ישראל בראשות זהבה גלאון | 1.64% | 1 | −1.5 |
| קץ | באומץ בשבילך | 1.64% | 1 | +1.3 |
What happened to these votes
1 people in Ne'urim voted for מרצ השמאל של ישראל בראשות זהבה גלאון. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 1.64% here, 0.5 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 3.16%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
62 voters out of 158 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Ne'urim against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Ramat Dawid · Sede Yo'av · Ma'oz Hayyim
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Ramat Dawid | 305 |
| Sede Yo'av | 302 |
| Ma'oz Hayyim | 303 |
| En Gev | 300 |
| Ashalim | 303 |
| She'ar Yashuv | 305 |
| Nir Moshe | 301 |
| Zanoah | 305 |
10 elections in Ne'urim
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 158 | 62 | 39.2% | −31.4 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 169 | 69 | 40.8% | −26.6 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 174 | 73 | 42.0% | −29.6 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 195 | 73 | 37.4% | −32.4 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 173 | 75 | 43.4% | −25.1 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 157 | 79 | 50.3% | −22.0 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 159 | 75 | 47.2% | −20.6 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 127 | 58 | 45.7% | −16.8 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 52 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 122 | 55 | 45.1% | −20.5 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.