Gibbeton
How Gibbeton voted in 2003
174 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת העבודה - מימד בראשות מצנע | 45.98% 80 votes |
+31.5 |
| מחל הליכוד עם אריאל שרון לראשות הממשלה | 17.24% 30 votes |
−12.1 |
| יש שינוי מפלגת החילונים ומעמד הביניים | 14.94% 26 votes |
+2.7 |
| מרצ מרצ - הבחירה הדמוקרטית - שחר | 12.07% 21 votes |
+6.9 |
| ב המפד"ל - המפלגה הדתית לאומית, המזרחי - הפועל המזרחי בארץ ישראל | 2.87% 5 votes |
−1.3 |
| ם עם אחד בראשות עמיר פרץ | 1.72% 3 votes |
−1.0 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 3 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (1.5%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קנ | עלה ירוק | 3.45% | 6 | +2.2 |
| נץ | חרות | 1.15% | 2 | −0.0 |
| רק | הירוקים | 0.57% | 1 | +0.2 |
What happened to these votes
6 people in Gibbeton voted for עלה ירוק. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 3.45% here, 2.9 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.20%, below the 1.5% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
175 voters out of 223 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Gibbeton against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Bet Zera · Allon HaGalil · Kefar HaNasi
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Bet Zera | 392 |
| Allon HaGalil | 330 |
| Kefar HaNasi | 304 |
| Avihayil | 592 |
| Shave Ziyyon | 404 |
| Shamir | 345 |
| Kefar Bilu | 491 |
| HaGosherim | 307 |
10 elections in Gibbeton
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 276 | 216 | 78.3% | +7.6 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 280 | 227 | 81.1% | +13.6 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 265 | 217 | 81.9% | +10.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 260 | 207 | 79.6% | +9.8 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 257 | 200 | 77.8% | +9.4 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 228 | 193 | 84.6% | +12.3 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 228 | 188 | 82.5% | +14.7 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 221 | 173 | 78.3% | +15.8 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 165 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 223 | 175 | 78.5% | +12.9 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.