Gibbeton
How Gibbeton voted in 2013
187 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת העבודה בראשות שלי יחימוביץ' | 37.43% 70 votes |
+26.0 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 19.79% 37 votes |
+5.5 |
| מרץ מרצ - השמאל של ישראל | 11.23% 21 votes |
+6.7 |
| צפ התנועה בראשות ציפי לבני | 9.63% 18 votes |
+4.6 |
| מחל הליכוד - ישראל ביתנו בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 8.02% 15 votes |
−15.3 |
| טב הבית היהודי בראשות נפתלי בנט - מיסודם של האיחוד הלאומי, המפד"ל החדשה | 5.88% 11 votes |
−3.2 |
| כן הישראלים | 2.14% 4 votes |
+0.1 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת, אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 0.53% 1 votes |
−4.6 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 4 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| יק | הישראלים | 2.14% | 4 | +1.6 |
| ז | ארץ חדשה – החזית להפלת שלטון ההון בראשות אלדד יניב ורני בלייר | 1.60% | 3 | +0.9 |
| קנ | עלה ירוק - הרשימה הליברלית | 1.07% | 2 | −0.1 |
| רק | הירוקים והצעירים לעתיד ירוק בישראל | 0.53% | 1 | +0.3 |
What happened to these votes
4 people in Gibbeton voted for הישראלים. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 2.14% here, 4.3 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.50%, below the 2.0% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
188 voters out of 228 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Gibbeton against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
10 elections in Gibbeton
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 276 | 216 | 78.3% | +7.6 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 280 | 227 | 81.1% | +13.6 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 265 | 217 | 81.9% | +10.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 260 | 207 | 79.6% | +9.8 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 257 | 200 | 77.8% | +9.4 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 228 | 193 | 84.6% | +12.3 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 228 | 188 | 82.5% | +14.7 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 221 | 173 | 78.3% | +15.8 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 165 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 223 | 175 | 78.5% | +12.9 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.