Rewaya
How Rewaya voted in 2006
109 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| שס התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 38.53% 42 votes |
+29.0 |
| אמת העבודה-מימד בראשות עמיר פרץ | 22.94% 25 votes |
+7.9 |
| מחל הליכוד עם בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 18.35% 20 votes |
+9.4 |
| טב איחוד לאומי - מפד"ל רשימה יהודית לאומית מאוחדת | 7.34% 8 votes |
+0.2 |
| כן קדימה – עם אהוד אולמרט לראשות הממשלה | 7.34% 8 votes |
−14.7 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 2.75% 3 votes |
−6.2 |
| זך גימלאי ישראל לכנסת | 0.92% 1 votes |
−5.0 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| כ | חזית יהודית לאומית בראשות ברוך מרזל | 0.92% | 1 | +0.1 |
| קנ | עלה ירוק | 0.92% | 1 | −0.4 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
The Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality for this election, so there is no turnout. It is not calculated or estimated: it is simply missing.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Rewaya against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Poriyya-Newe Oved · Ma'galim · Noqedim
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Poriyya-Newe Oved | 388 |
| Ma'galim | 443 |
| Noqedim | 314 |
| Bene Re'em | 457 |
| Nizzan | 376 |
| Elyaqim | 331 |
| Ahihud | 309 |
| Sede Uzziyyahu | 393 |
10 elections in Rewaya
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 271 | 187 | 69.0% | −1.6 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 259 | 168 | 64.9% | −2.6 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 255 | 181 | 71.0% | −0.5 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 255 | 181 | 71.0% | +1.1 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 253 | 173 | 68.4% | −0.1 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 221 | 152 | 68.8% | −3.6 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 210 | 142 | 67.6% | −0.2 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 193 | 124 | 64.2% | +1.7 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 109 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 171 | 109 | 63.7% | −1.9 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.