Rewaya
How Rewaya voted in 2015
150 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 45.33% 68 votes |
+21.9 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 18.67% 28 votes |
+12.9 |
| כ כולנו בראשות משה כחלון | 17.33% 26 votes |
+9.8 |
| טב הבית היהודי בראשות נפתלי בנט | 8.67% 13 votes |
+1.9 |
| אמת המחנה הציוני בראשות יצחק הרצוג וציפי לבני | 3.33% 5 votes |
−15.3 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל – דגל התורה | 3.33% 5 votes |
−1.7 |
| מרצ השמאל של ישראל | 0.67% 1 votes |
−3.3 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 0.67% 1 votes |
−8.2 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 3 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נץ | פרח – שפע, ברכה, חיים ושלום – נץ המהפך בחינוך, דיור ושלום אמת | 0.67% | 1 | +0.6 |
| קנ | עלה ירוק - גאה בבחירה שלי | 0.67% | 1 | −0.5 |
| קץ | יחד — העם איתנו בראשות אלי ישי | 0.67% | 1 | −2.3 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
152 voters out of 221 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Rewaya against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Nehalim · Ahisamakh · Ramat Magshimim
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Nehalim | 746 |
| Ahisamakh | 668 |
| Ramat Magshimim | 352 |
| Yakhini | 350 |
| Moreshet | 701 |
| Zafriyya | 392 |
| מעלה שומרון | 461 |
| Telamim | 414 |
10 elections in Rewaya
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 271 | 187 | 69.0% | −1.6 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 259 | 168 | 64.9% | −2.6 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 255 | 181 | 71.0% | −0.5 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 255 | 181 | 71.0% | +1.1 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 253 | 173 | 68.4% | −0.1 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 221 | 152 | 68.8% | −3.6 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 210 | 142 | 67.6% | −0.2 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 193 | 124 | 64.2% | +1.7 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 109 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 171 | 109 | 63.7% | −1.9 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.