Adanim
How Adanim voted in 2019
233 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד | 64.38% 150 votes |
+38.3 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 15.45% 36 votes |
−11.0 |
| מרצ מרצ- השמאל של ישראל | 5.58% 13 votes |
+1.9 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות אבי גבאי | 3.43% 8 votes |
−1.0 |
| כ כולנו הימין השפוי בראשות משה כחלון | 2.15% 5 votes |
−1.4 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו | 1.29% 3 votes |
−2.7 |
| ום חד"ש תע"ל בראשות איימן עודה ואחמד טיבי | 0.43% 1 votes |
−4.1 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 4 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נ | הימין החדש בראשות שקד ובנט | 3.00% | 7 | −0.2 |
| ז | זהות - תנועה ישראלית יהודית בהנהגת משה פייגלין | 2.15% | 5 | −0.6 |
| נר | גשר בראשות אורלי לוי אבקסיס | 1.72% | 4 | −0.0 |
| ק | צדק לכל כי הגיעה העת למען החי.האדם.והאדמה | 0.43% | 1 | +0.4 |
What happened to these votes
7 people in Adanim voted for הימין החדש בראשות שקד ובנט. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 3.00% here, 0.9 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 3.22%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
233 voters out of 299 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Adanim against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
10 elections in Adanim
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 293 | 220 | 75.1% | +4.5 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 293 | 230 | 78.5% | +11.1 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 295 | 235 | 79.7% | +8.1 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 300 | 232 | 77.3% | +7.5 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 299 | 233 | 77.9% | +9.5 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 292 | 229 | 78.4% | +6.1 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 283 | 225 | 79.5% | +11.7 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 284 | 218 | 76.8% | +14.3 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 216 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 256 | 203 | 79.3% | +13.7 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.