Adanim
How Adanim voted in 2020
235 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 65.96% 155 votes |
+39.4 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 20.43% 48 votes |
−9.0 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר - מרצ | 8.94% 21 votes |
+3.1 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 1.70% 4 votes |
−4.0 |
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת חד"ש, רע"מ, תע"ל, בל"ד | 1.28% 3 votes |
−11.4 |
| טב ימינה הימין החדש – הבית היהודי – האיחוד הלאומי | 0.85% 2 votes |
−4.4 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 0.43% 1 votes |
−7.3 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נץ | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 0.43% | 1 | +0.0 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
235 voters out of 295 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Adanim against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Ginnosar · HaGosherim · Hadar Am
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Ginnosar | 370 |
| HaGosherim | 455 |
| Hadar Am | 412 |
| Nezer Sereni | 503 |
| En Shemer | 427 |
| HaZorea | 610 |
| HaYogev | 435 |
| En Hod | 350 |
10 elections in Adanim
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 293 | 220 | 75.1% | +4.5 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 293 | 230 | 78.5% | +11.1 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 295 | 235 | 79.7% | +8.1 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 300 | 232 | 77.3% | +7.5 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 299 | 233 | 77.9% | +9.5 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 292 | 229 | 78.4% | +6.1 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 283 | 225 | 79.5% | +11.7 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 284 | 218 | 76.8% | +14.3 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 216 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 256 | 203 | 79.3% | +13.7 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.