Metav
How Metav voted in 2020
288 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 67.71% 195 votes |
+38.2 |
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 14.24% 41 votes |
−12.4 |
| טב ימינה הימין החדש – הבית היהודי – האיחוד הלאומי | 10.42% 30 votes |
+5.2 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 4.51% 13 votes |
−3.2 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר - מרצ | 1.04% 3 votes |
−4.8 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 1.04% 3 votes |
−4.7 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 0.35% 1 votes |
−5.6 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נץ | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 0.35% | 1 | −0.1 |
| ץ | דעם כלכלה ירוקה מדינה אחת | 0.35% | 1 | +0.3 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
289 voters out of 373 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Metav against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Poriyya-Newe Oved · Hosha'aya · Shetulim
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Poriyya-Newe Oved | 705 |
| Hosha'aya | 1,041 |
| Shetulim | 1,066 |
| Shahar | 387 |
| Gilat | 771 |
| Midrakh Oz | 411 |
| Maslul | 371 |
| Yad Rambam | 659 |
10 elections in Metav
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 364 | 290 | 79.7% | +9.0 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 359 | 265 | 73.8% | +6.4 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 373 | 289 | 77.5% | +6.0 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 375 | 284 | 75.7% | +5.9 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 377 | 296 | 78.5% | +10.1 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 353 | 274 | 77.6% | +5.3 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 345 | 234 | 67.8% | +0.1 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 326 | 217 | 66.6% | +4.1 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 207 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 286 | 188 | 65.7% | +0.1 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.