Metav
How Metav voted in 2021
265 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 62.64% 166 votes |
+38.4 |
| ב ימינה בראשות נפתלי בנט | 10.19% 27 votes |
+4.0 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 6.04% 16 votes |
−1.1 |
| ט הציונות הדתית בראשות בצלאל סמוטריץ' | 5.28% 14 votes |
+0.2 |
| ת תקווה חדשה בהנהגת גדעון סער לראשות הממשלה | 5.28% 14 votes |
+0.5 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 3.40% 9 votes |
−10.5 |
| כן כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 3.02% 8 votes |
−3.6 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 2.64% 7 votes |
−3.5 |
| מרצ מרצ – השמאל של ישראל | 0.75% 2 votes |
−3.8 |
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת (חד"ש, תע"ל, בל"ד) | 0.38% 1 votes |
−4.4 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 0.38% 1 votes |
−5.3 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
265 voters out of 359 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Metav against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Rosh Zurim · Bizzaron · Ma'barot
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Rosh Zurim | 419 |
| Bizzaron | 702 |
| Ma'barot | 585 |
| Matta | 406 |
| Bet Nehemya | 469 |
| Amirim | 389 |
| Ben Ammi | 415 |
| Azriqam | 700 |
10 elections in Metav
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 364 | 290 | 79.7% | +9.0 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 359 | 265 | 73.8% | +6.4 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 373 | 289 | 77.5% | +6.0 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 375 | 284 | 75.7% | +5.9 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 377 | 296 | 78.5% | +10.1 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 353 | 274 | 77.6% | +5.3 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 345 | 234 | 67.8% | +0.1 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 326 | 217 | 66.6% | +4.1 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 207 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 286 | 188 | 65.7% | +0.1 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.