Miqwe Yisra'el
How Miqwe Yisra'el voted in 2003
129 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת העבודה - מימד בראשות מצנע | 34.11% 44 votes |
+19.7 |
| מחל הליכוד עם אריאל שרון לראשות הממשלה | 18.60% 24 votes |
−10.8 |
| יש שינוי מפלגת החילונים ומעמד הביניים | 16.28% 21 votes |
+4.0 |
| ב המפד"ל - המפלגה הדתית לאומית, המזרחי - הפועל המזרחי בארץ ישראל | 11.63% 15 votes |
+7.4 |
| מרצ מרצ - הבחירה הדמוקרטית - שחר | 9.30% 12 votes |
+4.1 |
| ם עם אחד בראשות עמיר פרץ | 4.65% 6 votes |
+1.9 |
| ל האיחוד הלאומי ישראל ביתנו - מולדת תקומה | 2.33% 3 votes |
−3.2 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 1.55% 2 votes |
−2.7 |
| שס שס - התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 0.78% 1 votes |
−7.4 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (1.5%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קנ | עלה ירוק | 0.78% | 1 | −0.4 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
129 voters out of 183 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Miqwe Yisra'el against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Kefar Monash · Kefar Aviv · Emunim
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Kefar Monash | 370 |
| Kefar Aviv | 303 |
| Emunim | 361 |
| Sedot Yam | 388 |
| Bet Zayit | 610 |
| Ahuzzat Baraq | 436 |
| Kefar HaNagid | 445 |
| Burgeta | 401 |
10 elections in Miqwe Yisra'el
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 157 | 111 | 70.7% | +0.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 160 | 115 | 71.9% | +4.4 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 151 | 104 | 68.9% | −2.6 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 150 | 95 | 63.3% | −6.5 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 152 | 102 | 67.1% | −1.4 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 156 | 108 | 69.2% | −3.1 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 167 | 113 | 67.7% | −0.1 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 188 | 127 | 67.6% | +5.0 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 130 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 183 | 129 | 70.5% | +4.9 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.