Miqwe Yisra'el
How Miqwe Yisra'el voted in 2015
108 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת המחנה הציוני בראשות יצחק הרצוג וציפי לבני | 39.81% 43 votes |
+21.1 |
| טב הבית היהודי בראשות נפתלי בנט | 16.67% 18 votes |
+9.9 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 14.81% 16 votes |
−8.6 |
| כ כולנו בראשות משה כחלון | 9.26% 10 votes |
+1.8 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 8.33% 9 votes |
−0.5 |
| מרצ השמאל של ישראל | 6.48% 7 votes |
+2.6 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 1.85% 2 votes |
−3.3 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 0.93% 1 votes |
−4.8 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קנ | עלה ירוק - גאה בבחירה שלי | 0.93% | 1 | −0.2 |
| קץ | יחד — העם איתנו בראשות אלי ישי | 0.93% | 1 | −2.0 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
108 voters out of 156 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Miqwe Yisra'el against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Geva Karmel · Bene Darom · Liman
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Geva Karmel | 516 |
| Bene Darom | 308 |
| Liman | 390 |
| Hazeva | 362 |
| Herev Le'Et | 415 |
| Karkom | 335 |
| Arbel | 314 |
| Mesillat Ziyyon | 527 |
10 elections in Miqwe Yisra'el
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 157 | 111 | 70.7% | +0.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 160 | 115 | 71.9% | +4.4 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 151 | 104 | 68.9% | −2.6 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 150 | 95 | 63.3% | −6.5 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 152 | 102 | 67.1% | −1.4 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 156 | 108 | 69.2% | −3.1 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 167 | 113 | 67.7% | −0.1 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 188 | 127 | 67.6% | +5.0 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 130 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 183 | 129 | 70.5% | +4.9 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.