Amazya
How Amazya voted in 2003
67 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד עם אריאל שרון לראשות הממשלה | 65.67% 44 votes |
+36.3 |
| יש שינוי מפלגת החילונים ומעמד הביניים | 8.96% 6 votes |
−3.3 |
| אמת העבודה - מימד בראשות מצנע | 4.48% 3 votes |
−10.0 |
| ם עם אחד בראשות עמיר פרץ | 4.48% 3 votes |
+1.7 |
| מרצ מרצ - הבחירה הדמוקרטית - שחר | 4.48% 3 votes |
−0.7 |
| שס שס - התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 2.99% 2 votes |
−5.2 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (1.5%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נץ | חרות | 4.48% | 3 | +3.3 |
| קנ | עלה ירוק | 4.48% | 3 | +3.3 |
What happened to these votes
3 people in Amazya voted for חרות. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 4.48% here, 3.9 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.15%, below the 1.5% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
67 voters out of 106 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Amazya against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Gan Hayyim · Hagor · Negba
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Gan Hayyim | 332 |
| Hagor | 317 |
| Negba | 332 |
| Bet HaEmeq | 300 |
| Nir Yisra'el | 323 |
| Zurit | 305 |
| Shoval | 327 |
| כפר אז"ר | 314 |
10 elections in Amazya
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 149 | 104 | 69.8% | −0.8 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 158 | 103 | 65.2% | −2.3 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 185 | 133 | 71.9% | +0.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 195 | 143 | 73.3% | +3.5 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 220 | 162 | 73.6% | +5.2 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 319 | 254 | 79.6% | +7.3 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 341 | 275 | 80.6% | +12.9 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 258 | 192 | 74.4% | +11.9 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 76 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 106 | 67 | 63.2% | −2.4 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.