Amazya
How Amazya voted in 2015
254 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| טב הבית היהודי בראשות נפתלי בנט | 56.69% 144 votes |
+50.0 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 14.17% 36 votes |
−9.2 |
| אמת המחנה הציוני בראשות יצחק הרצוג וציפי לבני | 7.87% 20 votes |
−10.8 |
| כ כולנו בראשות משה כחלון | 7.09% 18 votes |
−0.4 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 2.76% 7 votes |
−6.1 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קץ | יחד — העם איתנו בראשות אלי ישי | 10.63% | 27 | +7.7 |
| קנ | עלה ירוק - גאה בבחירה שלי | 0.79% | 2 | −0.3 |
What happened to these votes
27 people in Amazya voted for יחד — העם איתנו בראשות אלי ישי. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 10.63% here, 3.6 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 2.97%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
254 voters out of 319 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Amazya against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Hinnanit · Bet Hashmonay · Newe Ilan
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Hinnanit | 502 |
| Bet Hashmonay | 1,083 |
| Newe Ilan | 492 |
| Mehola | 322 |
| Zurit | 463 |
| En Sarid | 778 |
| Haruzim | 447 |
| Ramot Naftali | 303 |
10 elections in Amazya
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 149 | 104 | 69.8% | −0.8 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 158 | 103 | 65.2% | −2.3 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 185 | 133 | 71.9% | +0.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 195 | 143 | 73.3% | +3.5 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 220 | 162 | 73.6% | +5.2 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 319 | 254 | 79.6% | +7.3 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 341 | 275 | 80.6% | +12.9 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 258 | 192 | 74.4% | +11.9 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 76 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 106 | 67 | 63.2% | −2.4 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.