Peqi'in Hadasha
How Peqi'in Hadasha voted in 2019
259 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 50.19% 130 votes |
+25.1 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי התורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 27.03% 70 votes |
+19.6 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר בראשות עמיר פרץ ואורלי לוי אבקסיס | 11.20% 29 votes |
+6.4 |
| פה כחול לבן - בראשות בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד | 3.86% 10 votes |
−22.1 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 2.32% 6 votes |
−3.7 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 1.54% 4 votes |
−5.4 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| כף | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 3.09% | 8 | +1.2 |
| זץ | צומת - התיישבות וחקלאות | 0.77% | 2 | +0.4 |
What happened to these votes
8 people in Peqi'in Hadasha voted for עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 3.09% here, 1.6 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.88%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
259 voters out of 325 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Peqi'in Hadasha against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Pesagot · Qeshet · Even Shemu'el
10 elections in Peqi'in Hadasha
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 355 | 282 | 79.4% | +8.8 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 336 | 256 | 76.2% | +8.7 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 323 | 270 | 83.6% | +12.1 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 325 | 259 | 79.7% | +9.8 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 317 | 250 | 78.9% | +10.4 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 281 | 207 | 73.7% | +1.3 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 256 | 169 | 66.0% | −1.8 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 245 | 171 | 69.8% | +7.3 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 140 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 183 | 146 | 79.8% | +14.2 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.