Peqi'in Hadasha
How Peqi'in Hadasha voted in 2020
269 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 59.85% 161 votes |
+30.4 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי תורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 30.11% 81 votes |
+22.4 |
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 6.69% 18 votes |
−19.9 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר - מרצ | 1.49% 4 votes |
−4.3 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 0.74% 2 votes |
−5.0 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 0.37% 1 votes |
−5.6 |
| טב ימינה הימין החדש – הבית היהודי – האיחוד הלאומי | 0.37% 1 votes |
−4.9 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| יז | אדום לבן – ח'ירבת דוראן בראשות עמי פינשטיין מחכים למשיח? משיח כבר כאן... | 0.37% | 1 | +0.4 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
270 voters out of 323 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Peqi'in Hadasha against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Yagel · Magshimim · Ben Zakkay
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Yagel | 493 |
| Magshimim | 530 |
| Ben Zakkay | 505 |
| Zekharya | 587 |
| Ahuzzat Baraq | 1,302 |
| Sitriyya | 629 |
| Geva Karmel | 524 |
| Bet Uzzi'el | 353 |
10 elections in Peqi'in Hadasha
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 355 | 282 | 79.4% | +8.8 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 336 | 256 | 76.2% | +8.7 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 323 | 270 | 83.6% | +12.1 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 325 | 259 | 79.7% | +9.8 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 317 | 250 | 78.9% | +10.4 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 281 | 207 | 73.7% | +1.3 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 256 | 169 | 66.0% | −1.8 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 245 | 171 | 69.8% | +7.3 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 140 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 183 | 146 | 79.8% | +14.2 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.