Alummot
How Alummot voted in 2015
177 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת המחנה הציוני בראשות יצחק הרצוג וציפי לבני | 59.32% 105 votes |
+40.6 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 14.69% 26 votes |
+5.9 |
| מרצ השמאל של ישראל | 11.86% 21 votes |
+7.9 |
| כ כולנו בראשות משה כחלון | 6.21% 11 votes |
−1.3 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 5.08% 9 votes |
−18.3 |
| טב הבית היהודי בראשות נפתלי בנט | 1.13% 2 votes |
−5.6 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל – דגל התורה | 0.56% 1 votes |
−4.4 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קנ | עלה ירוק - גאה בבחירה שלי | 1.13% | 2 | +0.0 |
What happened to these votes
2 people in Alummot voted for עלה ירוק - גאה בבחירה שלי. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 1.13% here, 1.0 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.12%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
177 voters out of 258 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Alummot against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Kefar Blum · Avigedor · HaGosherim
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Kefar Blum | 451 |
| Avigedor | 475 |
| HaGosherim | 414 |
| En HaMifraz | 509 |
| En HaHoresh | 534 |
| Yotvata | 404 |
| Ma'ale HaHamisha | 349 |
| Dvir | 398 |
10 elections in Alummot
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 333 | 228 | 68.5% | −2.2 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 316 | 205 | 64.9% | −2.6 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 300 | 210 | 70.0% | −1.5 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 303 | 208 | 68.6% | −1.2 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 312 | 227 | 72.8% | +4.3 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 258 | 177 | 68.6% | −3.7 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 239 | 163 | 68.2% | +0.4 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 224 | 137 | 61.2% | −1.3 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 134 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 200 | 131 | 65.5% | −0.1 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.