Alummot
How Alummot voted in 2019
208 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן - בראשות בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד | 45.19% 94 votes |
+19.2 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר בראשות עמיר פרץ ואורלי לוי אבקסיס | 23.08% 48 votes |
+18.3 |
| מרצ המחנה הדמוקרטי בהנהגת הורוביץ, שפיר וברק | 13.94% 29 votes |
+9.6 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 11.06% 23 votes |
−14.0 |
| טב ימינה בראשות איילת שקד הבית היהודי-האיחוד הלאומי-הימין החדש | 2.88% 6 votes |
−3.0 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 2.40% 5 votes |
−4.6 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 0.48% 1 votes |
−5.6 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי התורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 0.48% 1 votes |
−7.0 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| כף | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 0.48% | 1 | −1.4 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
208 voters out of 303 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Alummot against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Ne'ot Mordekhay · Giv'at Ye'arim · Hulata
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Ne'ot Mordekhay | 348 |
| Giv'at Ye'arim | 713 |
| Hulata | 332 |
| Irus | 324 |
| Sha'ar Efrayim | 927 |
| En Ya'aqov | 549 |
| Geva'ot Bar | 477 |
| Zerufa | 533 |
10 elections in Alummot
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 333 | 228 | 68.5% | −2.2 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 316 | 205 | 64.9% | −2.6 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 300 | 210 | 70.0% | −1.5 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 303 | 208 | 68.6% | −1.2 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 312 | 227 | 72.8% | +4.3 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 258 | 177 | 68.6% | −3.7 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 239 | 163 | 68.2% | +0.4 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 224 | 137 | 61.2% | −1.3 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 134 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 200 | 131 | 65.5% | −0.1 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.