Ibbim
How Ibbim voted in 2013
14 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד - ישראל ביתנו בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 35.71% 5 votes |
+12.4 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 14.29% 2 votes |
+5.5 |
| טב הבית היהודי בראשות נפתלי בנט - מיסודם של האיחוד הלאומי, המפד"ל החדשה | 7.14% 1 votes |
−2.0 |
| מרץ מרצ - השמאל של ישראל | 7.14% 1 votes |
+2.6 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 7.14% 1 votes |
−7.2 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| פז | כח להשפיע בהכוונת רבי אמנון יצחק | 14.29% | 2 | +13.5 |
| ץ | עם שלם - בהכוונת הרב חיים אמסלם | 14.29% | 2 | +13.1 |
What happened to these votes
2 people in Ibbim voted for כח להשפיע בהכוונת רבי אמנון יצחק. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 14.29% here, 19.3 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.74%, below the 2.0% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
14 voters out of 118 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Ibbim against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Qiryat Arba · Rosh Zurim · Yinnon
The nearest localities on the map. This locality has no others of a similar size, so the comparison is not limited by size.
| Qiryat Arba | 3,096 |
| Rosh Zurim | 389 |
| Yinnon | 494 |
| Netivot | 13,202 |
| Hazor HaGelilit | 4,418 |
| Bet Shemesh | 29,593 |
| Eli | 1,369 |
| Lavi | 390 |
10 elections in Ibbim
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 188 | 65 | 34.6% | −36.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 138 | 40 | 29.0% | −38.5 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 126 | 35 | 27.8% | −43.7 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 107 | 24 | 22.4% | −47.4 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 100 | 5 | 5.0% | −63.5 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 196 | 77 | 39.3% | −33.1 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 118 | 14 | 11.9% | −55.9 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 136 | 18 | 13.2% | −49.3 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 69 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 230 | 72 | 31.3% | −34.3 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.