Ibbim
How Ibbim voted in 2022
65 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל Likud | 44.62% 29 votes |
+21.2 |
| כן National Unity | 26.15% 17 votes |
+17.1 |
| ט Religious Zionist Party | 16.92% 11 votes |
+6.1 |
| שס Shas | 3.08% 2 votes |
−5.2 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 1.54% 1 votes |
−2.2 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 4 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ב | הבית היהודי בראשות איילת שקד | 3.08% | 2 | +1.9 |
| נז | כבוד האדם בראשות עו"ד ארקדי פוגץ` | 1.54% | 1 | +1.5 |
| צ | צעירים בוערים בהנהגת הדר מוכתר | 1.54% | 1 | +1.4 |
| קך | סדר חדש- למען האזרחים הותיקים בישראל | 1.54% | 1 | +1.5 |
What happened to these votes
2 people in Ibbim voted for הבית היהודי בראשות איילת שקד. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 3.08% here, 2.6 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.19%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
65 voters out of 188 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Ibbim against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Zanoah · Ma'ale Gilboa · Kefar Pines
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Zanoah | 305 |
| Ma'ale Gilboa | 309 |
| Kefar Pines | 312 |
| Yoshivya | 309 |
| Nogah | 323 |
| Avne Etan | 324 |
| Bne Netsarim | 308 |
| Pa'ame Tashaz | 308 |
10 elections in Ibbim
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 188 | 65 | 34.6% | −36.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 138 | 40 | 29.0% | −38.5 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 126 | 35 | 27.8% | −43.7 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 107 | 24 | 22.4% | −47.4 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 100 | 5 | 5.0% | −63.5 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 196 | 77 | 39.3% | −33.1 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 118 | 14 | 11.9% | −55.9 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 136 | 18 | 13.2% | −49.3 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 69 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 230 | 72 | 31.3% | −34.3 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.