Netiv HaGedud
How Netiv HaGedud voted in 2019
156 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת העבודה - גשר בראשות עמיר פרץ ואורלי לוי אבקסיס | 33.33% 52 votes |
+28.5 |
| פה כחול לבן - בראשות בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד | 31.41% 49 votes |
+5.5 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 21.79% 34 votes |
−3.3 |
| טב ימינה בראשות איילת שקד הבית היהודי-האיחוד הלאומי-הימין החדש | 5.77% 9 votes |
−0.1 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 3.85% 6 votes |
−3.1 |
| מרצ המחנה הדמוקרטי בהנהגת הורוביץ, שפיר וברק | 2.56% 4 votes |
−1.8 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי התורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 0.64% 1 votes |
−6.8 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| יז | אדום לבן - לגליזציה לקנביס, שוויון לאתיופים, ערבים ומקופחים | 0.64% | 1 | +0.5 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
156 voters out of 228 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Netiv HaGedud against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Mishmar Ayyalon · Newe Mivtah · Be'er Toviyya
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Mishmar Ayyalon | 354 |
| Newe Mivtah | 372 |
| Be'er Toviyya | 664 |
| Kefar Uriyya | 424 |
| Udim | 617 |
| Ramat Yohanan | 561 |
| Bazra | 600 |
| Kerem Maharal | 504 |
10 elections in Netiv HaGedud
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 225 | 137 | 60.9% | −9.7 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 236 | 156 | 66.1% | −1.3 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 233 | 167 | 71.7% | +0.2 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 228 | 156 | 68.4% | −1.4 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 154 | 107 | 69.5% | +1.0 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 149 | 105 | 70.5% | −1.9 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 142 | 81 | 57.0% | −10.7 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 130 | 70 | 53.8% | −8.7 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 74 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 126 | 53 | 42.1% | −23.5 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.