Netiv HaGedud
How Netiv HaGedud voted in 2020
166 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 36.14% 60 votes |
+9.6 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר - מרצ | 27.71% 46 votes |
+21.9 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 26.51% 44 votes |
−3.0 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 3.61% 6 votes |
−2.1 |
| טב ימינה הימין החדש – הבית היהודי – האיחוד הלאומי | 3.01% 5 votes |
−2.2 |
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת חד"ש, רע"מ, תע"ל, בל"ד | 1.20% 2 votes |
−11.5 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 3 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ז | עוצמה ליברלית – כלכלית בראשות גלעד אלפר | 0.60% | 1 | +0.5 |
| קי | שמע בראשות נפתלי גולדמן | 0.60% | 1 | +0.6 |
| קך | סדר חדש לשינוי שיטת הבחירות בראשות עו"ד אביטל אופק | 0.60% | 1 | +0.6 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
167 voters out of 233 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Netiv HaGedud against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Ma'ale HaHamisha · Ma'yan Barukh · Enat
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Ma'ale HaHamisha | 413 |
| Ma'yan Barukh | 334 |
| Enat | 474 |
| Yiftah | 382 |
| Dan | 379 |
| Kefar Szold | 377 |
| Yizre'el | 339 |
| Shamir | 468 |
10 elections in Netiv HaGedud
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 225 | 137 | 60.9% | −9.7 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 236 | 156 | 66.1% | −1.3 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 233 | 167 | 71.7% | +0.2 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 228 | 156 | 68.4% | −1.4 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 154 | 107 | 69.5% | +1.0 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 149 | 105 | 70.5% | −1.9 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 142 | 81 | 57.0% | −10.7 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 130 | 70 | 53.8% | −8.7 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 74 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 126 | 53 | 42.1% | −23.5 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.