Argaman
How Argaman voted in 2022
74 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל Likud | 37.84% 28 votes |
+14.4 |
| ט Religious Zionist Party | 22.97% 17 votes |
+12.1 |
| כן National Unity | 16.22% 12 votes |
+7.1 |
| שס Shas | 8.11% 6 votes |
−0.1 |
| פה Yesh Atid | 6.76% 5 votes |
−11.0 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ב | הבית היהודי בראשות איילת שקד | 6.76% | 5 | +5.6 |
| מרצ | מרצ השמאל של ישראל בראשות זהבה גלאון | 1.35% | 1 | −1.8 |
What happened to these votes
5 people in Argaman voted for הבית היהודי בראשות איילת שקד. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 6.76% here, 5.7 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.19%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
76 voters out of 121 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Argaman against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Ta'oz · Ma'ale Gilboa · Nofekh
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Ta'oz | 343 |
| Ma'ale Gilboa | 309 |
| Nofekh | 329 |
| Ramat Magshimim | 357 |
| Nogah | 323 |
| Pa'ame Tashaz | 308 |
| Rimmonim | 360 |
| Netiv HaShayyara | 309 |
10 elections in Argaman
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 121 | 76 | 62.8% | −7.8 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 122 | 81 | 66.4% | −1.0 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 124 | 86 | 69.4% | −2.2 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 128 | 85 | 66.4% | −3.5 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 128 | 83 | 64.8% | −3.6 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 130 | 88 | 67.7% | −4.6 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 134 | 85 | 63.4% | −4.3 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 139 | 84 | 60.4% | −2.1 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 80 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 117 | 73 | 62.4% | −3.2 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.