Gadot
How Gadot voted in 2015
243 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| אמת המחנה הציוני בראשות יצחק הרצוג וציפי לבני | 62.96% 153 votes |
+44.3 |
| מרצ השמאל של ישראל | 15.64% 38 votes |
+11.7 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 7.00% 17 votes |
−1.8 |
| כ כולנו בראשות משה כחלון | 3.70% 9 votes |
−3.8 |
| טב הבית היהודי בראשות נפתלי בנט | 2.47% 6 votes |
−4.3 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 2.47% 6 votes |
−20.9 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 1.23% 3 votes |
−3.9 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קנ | עלה ירוק - גאה בבחירה שלי | 4.12% | 10 | +3.0 |
| רק | הירוקים | 0.41% | 1 | +0.3 |
What happened to these votes
10 people in Gadot voted for עלה ירוק - גאה בבחירה שלי. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 4.12% here, 3.7 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.12%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
243 voters out of 355 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Gadot against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Reshafim · Kefar HaHoresh · Nahsholim
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Reshafim | 310 |
| Kefar HaHoresh | 331 |
| Nahsholim | 407 |
| Allonim | 403 |
| Deganya Bet | 404 |
| Erez | 302 |
| Shilat | 351 |
| Qoranit | 444 |
10 elections in Gadot
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 377 | 249 | 66.0% | −4.6 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 372 | 244 | 65.6% | −1.9 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 368 | 242 | 65.8% | −5.8 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 371 | 242 | 65.2% | −4.6 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 374 | 248 | 66.3% | −2.2 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 355 | 243 | 68.5% | −3.9 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 352 | 228 | 64.8% | −3.0 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 393 | 225 | 57.3% | −5.3 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 217 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 347 | 219 | 63.1% | −2.5 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.