Gadot
How Gadot voted in 2019
241 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| פה כחול לבן - בראשות בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד | 58.09% 140 votes |
+32.1 |
| מרצ המחנה הדמוקרטי בהנהגת הורוביץ, שפיר וברק | 18.26% 44 votes |
+13.9 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר בראשות עמיר פרץ ואורלי לוי אבקסיס | 14.52% 35 votes |
+9.7 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 4.15% 10 votes |
−21.0 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 2.07% 5 votes |
−4.9 |
| טב ימינה בראשות איילת שקד הבית היהודי-האיחוד הלאומי-הימין החדש | 1.24% 3 votes |
−4.6 |
| ודעם הרשימה המשותפת חד"ש, רע"ם, תע"ל, בל"ד | 0.41% 1 votes |
−10.2 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 3 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| זכ | מפלגת הדמוקראטורה | 0.41% | 1 | +0.4 |
| יז | אדום לבן - לגליזציה לקנביס, שוויון לאתיופים, ערבים ומקופחים | 0.41% | 1 | +0.3 |
| כף | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 0.41% | 1 | −1.5 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
242 voters out of 371 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Gadot against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Afeq · Qoranit · Bet Qeshet
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Afeq | 365 |
| Qoranit | 474 |
| Bet Qeshet | 353 |
| Huqoq | 307 |
| Sede Yo'av | 301 |
| Senir | 306 |
| Amir | 357 |
| Barqay | 334 |
10 elections in Gadot
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 377 | 249 | 66.0% | −4.6 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 372 | 244 | 65.6% | −1.9 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 368 | 242 | 65.8% | −5.8 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 371 | 242 | 65.2% | −4.6 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 374 | 248 | 66.3% | −2.2 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 355 | 243 | 68.5% | −3.9 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 352 | 228 | 64.8% | −3.0 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 393 | 225 | 57.3% | −5.3 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 217 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 347 | 219 | 63.1% | −2.5 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.