Gittit
How Gittit voted in 2003
52 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד עם אריאל שרון לראשות הממשלה | 48.08% 25 votes |
+18.7 |
| אמת העבודה - מימד בראשות מצנע | 19.23% 10 votes |
+4.8 |
| יש שינוי מפלגת החילונים ומעמד הביניים | 17.31% 9 votes |
+5.0 |
| ל האיחוד הלאומי ישראל ביתנו - מולדת תקומה | 11.54% 6 votes |
+6.0 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (1.5%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נ | ישראל אחרת כי נשבר מהפוליטיקאים | 1.92% | 1 | +1.7 |
| נץ | חרות | 1.92% | 1 | +0.8 |
What happened to these votes
1 people in Gittit voted for ישראל אחרת כי נשבר מהפוליטיקאים. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 1.92% here, 8.5 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 0.23%, below the 1.5% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
52 voters out of 93 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Gittit against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Sitriyya · Merhavya(Moshav) · Lohame HaGeta'ot
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 15 times the number of valid votes).
| Sitriyya | 396 |
| Merhavya(Moshav) | 331 |
| Lohame HaGeta'ot | 304 |
| Zur Moshe | 748 |
| Sarigim (Li-On) | 342 |
| Hazav | 413 |
| Nir Zevi | 533 |
| HaSolelim | 313 |
10 elections in Gittit
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 253 | 191 | 75.5% | +4.9 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 246 | 190 | 77.2% | +9.8 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 241 | 195 | 80.9% | +9.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 242 | 194 | 80.2% | +10.3 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 241 | 192 | 79.7% | +11.2 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 187 | 150 | 80.2% | +7.9 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 167 | 122 | 73.1% | +5.3 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 155 | 113 | 72.9% | +10.4 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 100 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 93 | 52 | 55.9% | −9.7 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.