Gittit
How Gittit voted in 2021
190 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| ט הציונות הדתית בראשות בצלאל סמוטריץ' | 35.79% 68 votes |
+30.7 |
| ב ימינה בראשות נפתלי בנט | 27.89% 53 votes |
+21.7 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 18.95% 36 votes |
−5.2 |
| כן כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ | 5.79% 11 votes |
−0.8 |
| ת תקווה חדשה בהנהגת גדעון סער לראשות הממשלה | 5.79% 11 votes |
+1.0 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות מרב מיכאלי | 1.58% 3 votes |
−4.5 |
| מרצ מרצ – השמאל של ישראל | 1.58% 3 votes |
−3.0 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 1.58% 3 votes |
−12.3 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 0.53% 1 votes |
−5.1 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ףז | הפיראטים | 0.53% | 1 | +0.5 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
190 voters out of 246 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Gittit against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Ramot · Mevo Betar · She'ar Yashuv
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Ramot | 328 |
| Mevo Betar | 477 |
| She'ar Yashuv | 300 |
| Gannot Hadar | 543 |
| Nir Yisra'el | 450 |
| En HaBesor | 536 |
| Sede Moshe | 305 |
| Geva'ot Bar | 518 |
10 elections in Gittit
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 253 | 191 | 75.5% | +4.9 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 246 | 190 | 77.2% | +9.8 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 241 | 195 | 80.9% | +9.4 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 242 | 194 | 80.2% | +10.3 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 241 | 192 | 79.7% | +11.2 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 187 | 150 | 80.2% | +7.9 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 167 | 122 | 73.1% | +5.3 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 155 | 113 | 72.9% | +10.4 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 100 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 93 | 52 | 55.9% | −9.7 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.