Peza'el
How Peza'el voted in 2015
176 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 32.95% 58 votes |
+9.6 |
| טב הבית היהודי בראשות נפתלי בנט | 21.59% 38 votes |
+14.8 |
| אמת המחנה הציוני בראשות יצחק הרצוג וציפי לבני | 20.45% 36 votes |
+1.8 |
| פה יש עתיד בראשות יאיר לפיד | 14.20% 25 votes |
+5.4 |
| כ כולנו בראשות משה כחלון | 7.95% 14 votes |
+0.5 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 0.57% 1 votes |
−4.5 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| קנ | עלה ירוק - גאה בבחירה שלי | 2.27% | 4 | +1.2 |
What happened to these votes
4 people in Peza'el voted for עלה ירוק - גאה בבחירה שלי. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 2.27% here, 2.0 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.12%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
176 voters out of 225 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Peza'el against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Mash'abbe Sade · Yotvata · Ofer
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Mash'abbe Sade | 317 |
| Yotvata | 404 |
| Ofer | 311 |
| Bazra | 553 |
| Sharona | 346 |
| HaYogev | 432 |
| Benaya | 526 |
| Shadmot Devora | 368 |
10 elections in Peza'el
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 269 | 209 | 77.7% | +7.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 244 | 187 | 76.6% | +9.2 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 239 | 187 | 78.2% | +6.7 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 238 | 195 | 81.9% | +12.1 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 230 | 195 | 84.8% | +16.3 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 225 | 176 | 78.2% | +5.9 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 224 | 157 | 70.1% | +2.3 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 223 | 146 | 65.5% | +3.0 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 146 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 208 | 133 | 63.9% | −1.7 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.