Peza'el
How Peza'el voted in 2019
195 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 36.92% 72 votes |
+11.8 |
| פה כחול לבן - בראשות בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד | 31.79% 62 votes |
+5.8 |
| טב ימינה בראשות איילת שקד הבית היהודי-האיחוד הלאומי-הימין החדש | 12.82% 25 votes |
+6.9 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר בראשות עמיר פרץ ואורלי לוי אבקסיס | 6.67% 13 votes |
+1.9 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 4.10% 8 votes |
−2.9 |
| מרצ המחנה הדמוקרטי בהנהגת הורוביץ, שפיר וברק | 2.05% 4 votes |
−2.3 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 3 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| כף | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 3.59% | 7 | +1.7 |
| זץ | צומת - התיישבות וחקלאות | 1.54% | 3 | +1.2 |
| ףז | הפיראטים - כי כולנו באותה סירה והכל אותו שייט | 0.51% | 1 | +0.5 |
What happened to these votes
7 people in Peza'el voted for עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 3.59% here, 1.9 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.88%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
195 voters out of 238 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Peza'el against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Bet HaLewi · Dvir · Mishmeret
10 elections in Peza'el
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 269 | 209 | 77.7% | +7.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 244 | 187 | 76.6% | +9.2 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 239 | 187 | 78.2% | +6.7 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 238 | 195 | 81.9% | +12.1 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 230 | 195 | 84.8% | +16.3 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 225 | 176 | 78.2% | +5.9 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 224 | 157 | 70.1% | +2.3 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 223 | 146 | 65.5% | +3.0 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 146 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 208 | 133 | 63.9% | −1.7 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.