Karmel
How Karmel voted in 2013
208 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| טב הבית היהודי בראשות נפתלי בנט - מיסודם של האיחוד הלאומי, המפד"ל החדשה | 80.77% 168 votes |
+71.6 |
| מחל הליכוד - ישראל ביתנו בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 7.69% 16 votes |
−15.6 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת, אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 0.48% 1 votes |
−4.7 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (2.0%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נץ | עוצמה לישראל בראשות אריה אלדד ומיכאל בן-ארי | 10.58% | 22 | +8.8 |
| קנ | עלה ירוק - הרשימה הליברלית | 0.48% | 1 | −0.7 |
What happened to these votes
22 people in Karmel voted for עוצמה לישראל בראשות אריה אלדד ומיכאל בן-ארי. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 10.58% here, 6.0 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.76%, below the 2.0% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
208 voters out of 243 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Karmel against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Berakha · Enav · Rosh Zurim
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Berakha | 706 |
| Enav | 358 |
| Rosh Zurim | 389 |
| Dalton | 339 |
| Alma | 327 |
| Kefar Tappuah | 501 |
| Tifrah | 764 |
| Pedu'el | 589 |
10 elections in Karmel
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 288 | 215 | 74.7% | +4.0 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 277 | 227 | 81.9% | +14.5 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 265 | 216 | 81.5% | +10.0 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 263 | 204 | 77.6% | +7.7 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 264 | 227 | 86.0% | +17.5 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 263 | 214 | 81.4% | +9.0 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 243 | 208 | 85.6% | +17.8 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 234 | 196 | 83.8% | +21.3 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 178 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 166 | 144 | 86.7% | +21.1 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.