Karmel
How Karmel voted in 2019
204 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| טב ימינה בראשות איילת שקד הבית היהודי-האיחוד הלאומי-הימין החדש | 75.00% 153 votes |
+69.1 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 12.75% 26 votes |
−12.4 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 2.45% 5 votes |
−3.6 |
| מרצ המחנה הדמוקרטי בהנהגת הורוביץ, שפיר וברק | 0.49% 1 votes |
−3.8 |
| פה כחול לבן - בראשות בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד | 0.49% 1 votes |
−25.5 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| כף | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 8.82% | 18 | +6.9 |
What happened to these votes
18 people in Karmel voted for עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 8.82% here, 4.7 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.88%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
204 voters out of 263 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Karmel against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Bet HaGaddi · Shuva · Moreshet
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Bet HaGaddi | 457 |
| Shuva | 331 |
| Moreshet | 760 |
| Qiryat Netafim | 360 |
| Pesagot | 815 |
| Yaqir | 999 |
| Qeshet | 313 |
| Dolev | 661 |
10 elections in Karmel
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 288 | 215 | 74.7% | +4.0 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 277 | 227 | 81.9% | +14.5 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 265 | 216 | 81.5% | +10.0 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 263 | 204 | 77.6% | +7.7 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 264 | 227 | 86.0% | +17.5 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 263 | 214 | 81.4% | +9.0 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 243 | 208 | 85.6% | +17.8 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 234 | 196 | 83.8% | +21.3 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 178 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 166 | 144 | 86.7% | +21.1 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.