Ateret
How Ateret voted in 2019
255 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| טב ימינה בראשות איילת שקד הבית היהודי-האיחוד הלאומי-הימין החדש | 73.33% 187 votes |
+67.5 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 7.45% 19 votes |
−17.6 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 2.75% 7 votes |
−3.3 |
| מרצ המחנה הדמוקרטי בהנהגת הורוביץ, שפיר וברק | 0.39% 1 votes |
−3.9 |
| פה כחול לבן - בראשות בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד | 0.39% 1 votes |
−25.6 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| כף | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 15.69% | 40 | +13.8 |
What happened to these votes
40 people in Ateret voted for עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 15.69% here, 8.3 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.88%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
255 voters out of 298 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Ateret against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Shuva · Bet HaGaddi · Moreshet
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Shuva | 331 |
| Bet HaGaddi | 457 |
| Moreshet | 760 |
| Qiryat Netafim | 360 |
| Pesagot | 815 |
| Qeshet | 313 |
| Yaqir | 999 |
| Enav | 421 |
10 elections in Ateret
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 327 | 264 | 80.7% | +10.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 311 | 256 | 82.3% | +14.9 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 299 | 237 | 79.3% | +7.7 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 298 | 255 | 85.6% | +15.7 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 295 | 256 | 86.8% | +18.3 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 279 | 244 | 87.5% | +15.1 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 251 | 213 | 84.9% | +17.1 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 227 | 200 | 88.1% | +25.6 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 170 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 146 | 122 | 83.6% | +18.0 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.