Ateret
How Ateret voted in 2022
264 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| ט Religious Zionist Party | 81.82% 216 votes |
+71.0 |
| מחל Likud | 9.09% 24 votes |
−14.3 |
| שס Shas | 1.14% 3 votes |
−7.1 |
| כן National Unity | 0.76% 2 votes |
−8.3 |
| ג United Torah Judaism | 0.38% 1 votes |
−5.5 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 2 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| ב | הבית היהודי בראשות איילת שקד | 6.44% | 17 | +5.2 |
| ינ | איחוד בני הברית -בראשות רב חובל בשארה שליאן | 0.38% | 1 | +0.4 |
What happened to these votes
17 people in Ateret voted for הבית היהודי בראשות איילת שקד. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 6.44% here, 5.4 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.19%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
264 voters out of 327 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Ateret against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Bne Dkalim · Ma'ale Levona · Qiryat Netafim
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Bne Dkalim | 625 |
| Ma'ale Levona | 351 |
| Qiryat Netafim | 388 |
| Meron | 327 |
| Shalwa | 351 |
| Ma'ale Amos | 324 |
| Avne Hefez | 1,044 |
| Mattityahu | 374 |
10 elections in Ateret
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 327 | 264 | 80.7% | +10.1 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 311 | 256 | 82.3% | +14.9 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 299 | 237 | 79.3% | +7.7 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 298 | 255 | 85.6% | +15.7 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 295 | 256 | 86.8% | +18.3 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 279 | 244 | 87.5% | +15.1 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 251 | 213 | 84.9% | +17.1 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 227 | 200 | 88.1% | +25.6 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 170 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 146 | 122 | 83.6% | +18.0 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.