Hermesh
How Hermesh voted in 2003
78 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד עם אריאל שרון לראשות הממשלה | 47.44% 37 votes |
+18.0 |
| ל האיחוד הלאומי ישראל ביתנו - מולדת תקומה | 17.95% 14 votes |
+12.4 |
| יש שינוי מפלגת החילונים ומעמד הביניים | 15.38% 12 votes |
+3.1 |
| אמת העבודה - מימד בראשות מצנע | 7.69% 6 votes |
−6.8 |
| שס שס - התאחדות הספרדים העולמית שומרי תורה | 3.85% 3 votes |
−4.4 |
| כן ישראל בעליה בראשות נתן שרנסקי | 1.28% 1 votes |
−0.9 |
| מרצ מרצ - הבחירה הדמוקרטית - שחר | 1.28% 1 votes |
−3.9 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (1.5%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נץ | חרות | 5.13% | 4 | +4.0 |
What happened to these votes
4 people in Hermesh voted for חרות. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 5.13% here, 4.5 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.15%, below the 1.5% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
79 voters out of 156 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Hermesh against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Sarigim (Li-On) · Lohame HaGeta'ot · Bet HaGaddi
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Sarigim (Li-On) | 342 |
| Lohame HaGeta'ot | 304 |
| Bet HaGaddi | 306 |
| Be'erotayim | 301 |
| Bene Ziyyon | 383 |
| Nili | 367 |
| Merhavya(Moshav) | 331 |
| Rinnatya | 363 |
10 elections in Hermesh
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 213 | 138 | 64.8% | −5.8 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 212 | 131 | 61.8% | −5.6 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 207 | 132 | 63.8% | −7.7 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 203 | 140 | 69.0% | −0.9 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 204 | 141 | 69.1% | +0.7 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 181 | 122 | 67.4% | −4.9 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 170 | 103 | 60.6% | −7.2 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 154 | 88 | 57.1% | −5.4 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 74 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 156 | 79 | 50.6% | −15.0 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.