Hermesh
How Hermesh voted in 2019
128 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 36.72% 47 votes |
+11.6 |
| ל ישראל ביתנו בראשות אביגדור ליברמן | 23.44% 30 votes |
+16.4 |
| פה כחול לבן - בראשות בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד | 20.31% 26 votes |
−5.6 |
| טב ימינה בראשות איילת שקד הבית היהודי-האיחוד הלאומי-הימין החדש | 10.16% 13 votes |
+4.3 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר בראשות עמיר פרץ ואורלי לוי אבקסיס | 3.91% 5 votes |
−0.9 |
| מרצ המחנה הדמוקרטי בהנהגת הורוביץ, שפיר וברק | 3.91% 5 votes |
−0.4 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 0.78% 1 votes |
−5.3 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| יז | אדום לבן - לגליזציה לקנביס, שוויון לאתיופים, ערבים ומקופחים | 0.78% | 1 | +0.7 |
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
140 voters out of 203 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Hermesh against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Nir Dawid (Tel Amal) · Kefar Bialik · Ma'yan Barukh
The nearest localities on the map, among those of a similar size (within 5 times the number of valid votes).
| Nir Dawid (Tel Amal) | 455 |
| Kefar Bialik | 360 |
| Ma'yan Barukh | 339 |
| En Shemer | 427 |
| Shadmot Devora | 399 |
| Lohame HaGeta'ot | 415 |
| HaHoterim | 444 |
| Enat | 455 |
10 elections in Hermesh
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 213 | 138 | 64.8% | −5.8 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 212 | 131 | 61.8% | −5.6 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 207 | 132 | 63.8% | −7.7 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 203 | 140 | 69.0% | −0.9 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 204 | 141 | 69.1% | +0.7 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 181 | 122 | 67.4% | −4.9 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 170 | 103 | 60.6% | −7.2 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 154 | 88 | 57.1% | −5.4 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 74 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 156 | 79 | 50.6% | −15.0 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.