Pene Hever
How Pene Hever voted in 2019
179 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| טב איחוד מפלגות הימין הבית היהודי-האיחוד הלאומי- עוצמה יהודית | 76.54% 137 votes |
+72.8 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 11.17% 20 votes |
−15.3 |
| אמת מפלגת העבודה בראשות אבי גבאי | 1.68% 3 votes |
−2.8 |
| פה כחול לבן בראשות בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד | 1.68% 3 votes |
−24.5 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי התורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 1.12% 2 votes |
−4.9 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 0.56% 1 votes |
−5.2 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 3 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| נ | הימין החדש בראשות שקד ובנט | 4.47% | 8 | +1.3 |
| ז | זהות - תנועה ישראלית יהודית בהנהגת משה פייגלין | 2.23% | 4 | −0.5 |
| ק | צדק לכל כי הגיעה העת למען החי.האדם.והאדמה | 0.56% | 1 | +0.5 |
What happened to these votes
8 people in Pene Hever voted for הימין החדש בראשות שקד ובנט. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 4.47% here, 1.4 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 3.22%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
181 voters out of 213 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Pene Hever against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Otni'el · Ahisamakh · Kefar Tappuah
10 elections in Pene Hever
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 267 | 211 | 79.0% | +8.4 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 249 | 198 | 79.5% | +12.1 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 229 | 175 | 76.4% | +4.9 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 222 | 174 | 78.4% | +8.5 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 213 | 181 | 85.0% | +16.5 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 192 | 166 | 86.5% | +14.1 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 163 | 136 | 83.4% | +15.7 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 133 | 108 | 81.2% | +18.7 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 101 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 111 | 94 | 84.7% | +19.1 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.