Pene Hever
How Pene Hever voted in 2019
172 valid votes.
| List | Share | Against national |
|---|---|---|
| טב ימינה בראשות איילת שקד הבית היהודי-האיחוד הלאומי-הימין החדש | 56.40% 97 votes |
+50.5 |
| מחל הליכוד בהנהגת בנימין נתניהו לראשות הממשלה | 9.30% 16 votes |
−15.8 |
| ג יהדות התורה והשבת אגודת ישראל - דגל התורה | 6.98% 12 votes |
+0.9 |
| שס התאחדות הספרדים שומרי התורה תנועתו של מרן הרב עובדיה יוסף זצ"ל | 3.49% 6 votes |
−4.0 |
| פה כחול לבן - בראשות בני גנץ ויאיר לפיד | 2.91% 5 votes |
−23.0 |
| אמת העבודה - גשר בראשות עמיר פרץ ואורלי לוי אבקסיס | 0.58% 1 votes |
−4.2 |
"Against national" is the gap, in percentage points, from the national result in the same election. It is what turns the number into an answer.
Show 1 more lists that did not enter the Knesset
These lists got votes here but fell below the national threshold (3.25%), even where their share here was far larger.
| כף | עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר | 20.35% | 35 | +18.5 |
What happened to these votes
35 people in Pene Hever voted for עוצמה יהודית בראשות איתמר בן גביר. None of them elected anyone.
The list took 20.35% here, 10.8 times its national share. Nationally it stopped at 1.88%, below the 3.25% threshold, and won no seats.
Download the data: CSV · JSON — every election, not only the one in the table. UTF-8 with a BOM, so that Excel shows Hebrew correctly.
174 voters out of 222 eligible.
There is no path here. The map places a locality only in elections where at least 300 valid votes were counted; below that, a handful of ballots moves a whole percentage point and the position would be noise, not a finding. This locality has no stable position in any election.
Pene Hever against another locality, on the same axes and against the same national result.
For example: Brukhin · Kefar Tappuah · Elon More
10 elections in Pene Hever
| Knesset | Eligible | Voters | Turnout | Against national | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25th 2022 | 267 | 211 | 79.0% | +8.4 | The results → |
| 24th 2021 | 249 | 198 | 79.5% | +12.1 | The results → |
| 23rd 2020 | 229 | 175 | 76.4% | +4.9 | The results → |
| 22nd 2019 | 222 | 174 | 78.4% | +8.5 | The results → |
| 21st 2019 | 213 | 181 | 85.0% | +16.5 | The results → |
| 20th 2015 | 192 | 166 | 86.5% | +14.1 | The results → |
| 19th 2013 | 163 | 136 | 83.4% | +15.7 | The results → |
| 18th 2009 | 133 | 108 | 81.2% | +18.7 | The results → |
| 17th 2006 | Not in source | 101 | Not in source | Not in source | The results → |
| 16th 2003 | 111 | 94 | 84.7% | +19.1 | The results → |
In years when the Central Elections Committee published no count of eligible voters by locality there is no turnout, and the line breaks there. It is not filled in by guesswork.